Court of Appeals to Directors of Nonprofits: 'Nonprofit' Does Not Mean 'No Risk for You'
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
U.S.%20Court%20of%20Appeals%20for%20the%20Third%20Circuit<%2Fa>%20recently%20upheld%20a%20$2.25%20million%20jury%20verdict%20against%20the%20directors%20of%20a%20nonprofit%20nursing%20home,%20holding%20them%20personally%20liable%20for%20breach%20of%20their%20duty%20of%20care.%20Their%20sin%3F%20Failing%20to%20remove%20the%20nursing%20home’s%20administrator%20and%20CFO%20“once%20the%20results%20of%20their%20mismanagement%20became%20apparent.”%20The%20decision,%20while%20unusual,%20illustrates%20that%20serving%20on%20a%20nonprofit%20board%20is%20not%20risk-free%20even%20if%20as%20in%20this%20case,%20the%20directors%20do%20not%20breach%20their%20duty%20of%20loyalty%20or%20engage%20in%20any%20self-dealing.%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.nonprofitpro.com%2Faggregatedcontent%2Fcourt-appeals-directors-nonprofits-nonprofit-doesnt-mean-no-risk%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="16716" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit recently upheld a $2.25 million jury verdict against the directors of a nonprofit nursing home, holding them personally liable for breach of their duty of care. Their sin? Failing to remove the nursing home’s administrator and CFO “once the results of their mismanagement became apparent.” The decision, while unusual, illustrates that serving on a nonprofit board is not risk-free even if as in this case, the directors do not breach their duty of loyalty or engage in any self-dealing.
0 Comments
View Comments
Related Content
Comments