Case Study: Building a Donor Base Through E-mail, Part 1

"We validated the results, so what we found in this case, with this organization, with this file, the long-form worked better," Kachuriak says.

As a result, Kachuriak shares three keys KMA and the Colson Center took away from those tests:

1. Best practices aren't enough. "Even though we had established this new best practice where we really focus on the click and get them to the landing page and then on the landing page we give them the strong representation of the value proposition and move them into the ask, that doesn't work for every organization. Each relationship with each donor is unique, just as each organization is unique," Kachuriak says.
2. You must validate results for the correct metrics. "If we were just measuring clickthrough rates, which many organization do, [the Colson Center] would have missed out on a ton of donors and members and opportunities to have greater impact because of the dollars represented by those donors and members," Kachuriak says. "The key is you have to measure the right metrics, and you also have to validate those results to make sure you have a statistically significant result."
3. The learning is more valuable than the lift. "What did we learn? The biggest thing we learned is that the messenger in many cases is more important than the message," Kachuriak says. "… If you look at the e-mail and the creative, the e-mail content itself is signed by [founder] Chuck Colson; the landing page is signed by nobody. … the more that Chuck says, the more weight it carries for people to take action, the more motivating it is, the more predisposed they are to actually complete whatever action Chuck tells them to take once they get to the landing page."

Check back next week for part 2 to learn about a monthly giving program that KMA and the Colson Center established, as well as results of the partnership.