Efficiency Measures Discriminate Against Lesser-Known Causes
By
Dan Pallotta
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
July 8, 2009, Harvard Business Online — This is the fourth in a series on the failings of "efficiency" measures. Today: discrimination against less popular causes.
In 1988 the Supreme Court took up the matter of a North Carolina law which stated that any professional solicitor's fee which exceeded 20% of the total funds raised was unreasonable.
0 Comments
View Comments
- Places:
- North Carolina
Dan Pallotta
Author's page
Related Content
Comments