NCRP Statement Regarding the Philanthropy Roundtable's "How Public is Private Philanthropy: Separating Myth from Reality"
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
June%2030,%202009%20—<%2Fstrong>%20The%20National%20Committee%20for%20Responsive%20Philanthropy%20(NCRP)%20is%20pleased%20that%20the%20Philanthropy%20Roundtable%20is%20contributing%20to%20the%20dialogue%20in%20our%20sector%20about%20the%20public's%20role%20in%20private%20philanthropy.%20The%20monograph%20they%20recently%20published,%20How%20Public%20is%20Private%20Philanthropy%3A%20Separating%20Myth%20from%20Reality,%20explores%20many%20critically%20important%20issues%20and%20adds%20to%20ongoing%20discussions.%20Unfortunately,%20the%20authors%20asked%20the%20wrong%20questions%20and%20their%20conclusions%20miss%20the%20mark.%0D%0A%0D%0Ahttps%3A%2F%2Fwww.nonprofitpro.com%2Farticle%2Fncrp-statement-regarding-philanthropy-roundtables-how-public-private-philanthropy-separating-myth-reality-409705%2F" target="_blank" class="email" data-post-id="8385" type="icon_link">
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
According to authors Evelyn Brody of the Chicago-Kent College of Law and John Tyler of the Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation, attempts to characterize private philanthropic assets as "public" or "partially-public" dollars threaten the autonomy of philanthropy in America by opening foundations to legislative interference into their governance, mission and decision-making. Efforts to reform the sector, therefore, should not be associated with such "distractions." The final paragraph to the foreword sums up their argument succinctly:
0 Comments
View Comments
- Places:
- America
Aaron Dorfman
Author's page
Related Content
Comments