The Debate Over Fundraising Costs
It's a hot-button issue, indeed, but it's time to turn the focus to the right things.
By
Tom Harrison
Facebook
Facebook
Twitter
Twitter
LinkedIn
LinkedIn
Email
Email
0 Comments
Comments
What we can learn
Rather than rehash the accusations and cases here, I simply want to explore what we can learn from these painful situations.
At a minimum, let's agree to some key principles:
- Nonprofits operate based on the public's trust; hence, like Caesar's wife, we must behave in a way that it is entirely above suspicion.
- Fundraising appeals must be accurate and honest.
- Nonprofits must do what they promise and should be judged on the impact of their programs.
- The nonprofit (not the consultant) must be in control of its own programs, fundraising strategies, budgets and lists.
- Common business ethics dictate that consultants should never recommend something to a client that is good for the consultant but not for the client. Those who do will soon find themselves without any clients.
- Certainly, nonprofits (and their consultants) need to understand and obey all applicable federal, state and local laws.
The recent cases should have been about transparency, honesty, the impact of a nonprofit and ethical business practices. Instead these key issues have been eclipsed by a debate on the cost of fundraising.
0 Comments
View Comments
- Companies:
- Direct Marketing Association
- Russ Reid
E
Tom Harrison
Author's page
Tom Harrison is the former chair of Russ Reid and Omnicom's Nonprofit Group of Agencies. He served as chair of the NonProfit PRO Editorial Advisory Board.
Related Content
Comments