Craver, Mathews, Smith & Co.
In October, FundRaising Success held its fourth annual Virtual Conference & Expo, a daylong, online gathering that allowed fundraisers to listen to and interact with some of the industry’s most respected and innovative fundraisers. Our closing session was a panel discussion focusing on things nonprofits need to think about and do to grow and thrive in 2014 and beyond.
FundRaising Success is blessed and proud to work with some of the brightest stars in the fundraising firmament. Meet our latest 2014 Editorial Advisory Board members.
FundRaising Success announces the 2013 Gold Awards for Fundraising Excellence Direct Mail (Less Than $10 Million) winners: City Harvest and Good Counsel.
This year, the FSV advisors tackled the issues every-sized organization and mission need to know to thrive well into the next decades.
As we gear up for this year's Gold Awards for Fundraising Excellence competition, take a look back at our winner from 2008, Habitat for Humanity's Habitat Challenge package, submitted by Craver, Mathews, Smith & Co.
With the 2013 FundRaising Success Gold Awards for Fundraising Excellence submission period in full swing, take a look back at the 2008 Package of the Year winner, Habitat for Humanity International's “Habitat Challenge” special development appeal, submitted by Craver, Mathews, Smith & Co.
This session pulls together real data champs to help you figure out the best ways to gather that donor info and what to do with it.
Two weeks ago, we here at FundRaising Success hosted our third annual FS Virtual Conference & Expo. If you weren't able to attend, did attend but missed a few of the sessions, or would like to view and listen to any of the sessions again, you still can! The free virtual conference is available on-demand until Jan. 15. Simply register here and view at your convenience.
The third annual FundRaising Success Virtual Conference & Expo takes place today. Check out the agenda and join us for a fundraising-filled day.
"Overall, we saw some very strong but very traditional campaigns — very few major risks or outside-the-box approaches," judge Dane Grams said. "Was this a wise choice? It seems like it was, as most of the results we reviewed were incredibly strong."